Hillary: The HRC finesse
have been saying for months that I do not think Hillary R. Clinton will
in fact enter the U.S. Senate race in New York. I still think that. When
the deadline for filing papers arrives, Hillary will be a no-show. This
alleged Senate race and the over-covered "Listening/Carpetbagger Tour"
is (in my opinion) a sham.
had been reluctant to tell WorldNetDaily readers what I have been telling
my radio audience, until someone reminded me of my box score. I was one
of the first talking about the implausible anomalies surrounding Vince
Foster. I was one of the first to expose Senator Diane Feinstein's duplicity
in the Desert Wilderness Protection Act. I was ahead of the curve on Filegate,
Zippergate, and Chinagate. Matt Drudge was the only one to beat me on Monica.
My column on the odd death of James McDougal sparked others to follow up.
Last year, I introduced WND readers to Y2K and Echelon's spy network (both
of which have turned into boutique industries).
scoff if you will, but it seems I have been right a lot more than I have
been wrong ... so far. Consider the following:
is a very real anti-Hillary movement erupting nationally. So what? This
is a regional race in New York State. Well, kinda. Defenders of deep-pocket
campaign contributors have long held that giving money is a First Amendment
right. Even courts agree. Critics of those rulings can now realize some
payback -- and yes, it is a Hillary.
now established her "exploratory committee," Hillary can legally (not that
has bothered her in the past) raise campaign money.
she is legally permitted to bank that money for "any political" purpose.
She does not have to spend the money on a N.Y. Senate race, and she does
not have to share the money with whoever ends up being the "real" Democrat
to battle Rudy Guiliani.
W.A.G. is this: that subsequent to raising millions of dollars (it's easier
to do as the wife of a sitting president than whatever the fates hold for
the odd couple in the new millennium), Madam C will bow to the will of
her political advisors and "prepare" for a subsequent U.S. Senate race
in Illinois (where she might actually win).
the window of time between her eventually acknowledging the reality check
of New York, and her "real" objective in Illinois, expect HRC to be appointed
to some officious sounding United Nothing Task Force. That will permit
her the luxury of maintaining a steady flow of photo ops, and continue
to remain active in "public service" using OPM (other people's money).
course, as Dennis Miller says, "That's just opinion ... I could be wrong"
-- but I don't think so.
there was not a "vast right wing conspiracy" prior to Hillary's harping
rant, she may have single-handedly been the catalyst to create the fictional
bogeyman she so reviled.
New York Times recently noted, " ... her expected bid for public office
has inspired fierce opposition and a flow of checks from conservatives
in far-flung places like Alabama and New Hampshire." They could have also
added San Francisco.
week I was listening to my radio colleagues on KSFO in San Francisco, Lee
Rodgers and Melanie Morgan. A caller posed some questions about New York
State residency laws. He asked, "If you only have to be a resident of the
state for one day before the election to be a U.S. senator, what are the
voter residency requirements?" You could hear light bulbs going off from
Monterey to Tahoe -- the combined intake of air virtually cleared all the
fog off the Golden Gate Bridge. "Hey, what if we got a few hundred thousand
KSFO listeners to all register to vote in New York? We could use one address,
and maybe qualify for state funded assistance. ... " From that point on
the conversation vacillated between brilliant and silly. Was that exchange
just a snippet of spontaneous talk radio, or a spark on a gasoline soaked
crusade is decidedly "anti-Hillary" and not necessarily "pro-Rudy." In
fact, Craig Shirley has helped organize "Conservatives for Effective Leadership."
It is a Political Action Committee with a goal of raising $10 million to
pay for ads against Hillary in New York next year. Shirley says, "It's
less motivated by the Republican we want to win; it's motivated by preventing
her to be elected to the United States Senate.
chairman of the Alabama GOP, Winton Blount III, asked 10,000 donors for
donations of $50 or $100, saying, "It's going to take more than a village
to defeat Hillary Clinton." However, in the wake of all the "pillory Hillary"
posturing and fund raising, the more significant impediments to her really
taking on 'this' race are real and serious:
if she ran, would be compelled to answer questions she has spent a decade
mainstream media have conspired with the Clintons (recall 60-minutes honcho
Don Hewitt masterful editing finesse in '92). The mainstream media has
taken it easy on Hillary for a variety of weak reasons, which tend to personify
course she will not be under oath and can lie.
can "try" to blame the VRWC for the questions and refuse to respond. However,
that gambit might work in the beltway, but it ain't gonna play in Flatbush,
Brooklyn, or the Bronx.
Starr may have cut a deal with the devil, tucked tail and run, but others
remain to peel scabs off the woman who would be king:
protect the "dignity" of the first lady.
because of the egregious and insulting behavior of her rogue husband.
fiction that she is the smartest lawyer in the country, despite her penchant
for doing and saying remarkably stupid things.
I know I used those last three twice. You got a problem with that? Send
your complaints to my New York address.
Klayman, at Judicial Watch, is not going sweetly into the night. Several
of Judical Watch's lawsuits involve Hillary, and unlike the New York press,
Larry will get to ask his questions with Lady Macbeth under oath.
York talk radio and those diffident denizens of the airways like Rush Limbaugh,
Sean Hannity, Bob Grant, Don Imus; and now they have Matt Drudge and the
master of subtle understatement, Howard Stern ...
Guiliani and/or his campaign attack dogs "may" just require HRC to address
a long list of explosive issues:
of power under color of authority
by the way how DID those billing records turn up?"
care task force secrecy
of power under the color of authority.