Five or ten years ago, I used to hear about grand conspiracies and smile. Oh, I knew about the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers, but it seemed natural that like-minded people (especially rich and powerful people) would find a forum to socialize. I considered the flocking of turkeys (whether rich powerful globalists, or Louis Farrakan's black separatists) largely sound and fury signifying ... nothing. I was wrong. Very, very wrong.

In the wake of years of study, interviews, and critical analysis, I have learned (and believe) that hardly anything happens by chance. Conspiracies DO exist, and to arrogantly discount their existence, intentions, and results, is myopic, pretentious, and stupid.

If or when you read beyond the revisionist history of duplicitous academicians, you learn:

• The stock market has been manipulated. Past crashes designed and managed.
• The precipitation of World War One was orchestrated. The victims of the Lusitania were sacrificial pawns.
• The government knew about Pearl Harbor before the attack. More sacrificial pawns to justify the controllers' plan.
• Bay of Pigs. ...
• Korean War (which by the way has never officially ended) ... a sham.
• Vietnam? The Gulf of Tonkin was an exercise in creative writing.
• Dominican Republic, Grenada, Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo ... bovine scatology constructed to bedazzle, confound, confuse, and control. ...

• Money buys control.
• Mainstream media functions as a co-conspirator. Recently I saw a wonderful headline, which noted "Fourth estate has become the Fifth Column." If anyone knows the author of that please let me know so I can send a thank you note.
• Folks have been conditioned to be fat, dumb, and lazy. Bread and circuses overshadow the essence of the republic.

According to a recent CBS report, "50 percent of Americans in a poll do not know where to find Kosovo on a map. However, 54 percent favor sending U.S. troops there."

The propaganda honchos have done their job well -- very well.

Reports from no less than six different independent sources claim that NATO purposely targeted the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. Why? The U.S. has routinely and consistently bent over backwards to accommodate, mollify, stroke, and ignore aggression from communist Red China. Why purposely and specifically target a Chinese Embassy?

When the U.S. struck Libya in the early Reagan years, the French Embassy was bombed. Whoops! Reportedly, the raid was put on hold for several days until the French ambassador left the compound. Supposedly, the raid was in retaliation for the French not allowing U.S. planes in their airspace. Gee, the U.S. will bomb an ally's embassy to send a "message." Must be standard operating procedure.

But why hit the Chinese Embassy? What if it was done to derail the peace initiative being put forward by the Russians and the Chinese? Allegedly, the neo-socialist troika of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and Gerhard Schroder are so desperate to win in Kosovo that the gloves are off, and they will do almost anything. According to numerous analysts, this is a war against national sovereignty -- all and any national sovereignty.

If the one-worlders can realize their agenda, countries will no longer be autonomous.

Borders will vanish, and henceforth an international watch dog/cabal would oversee everything, everywhere, every time. If or when a country refuses to comply with international treaties implemented by the United Nations, we should anticipate "the Serbian Solution."

The Terrible Three were intent on crushing not just Milosevic -- but the concept of national sovereignty. However, up jumped the devil, and Jesse Jackson soiled their sheets. Jesse successfully positioned himself as a senior statesman and diplomat who suggested a course of action which would end the killing and fix the "perceived problem" but not the "real problem."

As my friend Joseph Farah often suggests, connect the dots:

 
• Russian leaders agreed to broker a peace agreement between NATO and Milosevic.
• When it appeared that the Russian agreement was going to be successful in stopping the "ethnic cleansing" of Kosovo.
• The Big Bad Terrible Three had to act FAST.
• The Russian agreement had Kosovo staying part of Serbia, with no autonomy.
• If this were let to stand it would mean that Milosevic had won.
• He had successfully cleansed part of Kosovo of Muslims.
• The Muslims would not be able to turn Kosovo into a Muslim nation with its own language, alphabet, schools, religion, army and police force.

The solution proposed by Russia would mean that all countries would be able to control what went on within their own borders. It would mean that California would be able to call out the National Guard or the Army if the Atzlan Liberation Army demanded autonomy for southern California. If the Cuban refugees tried to annex Miami, Florida's governor could actually stop them.

This solution is anathema to the plan for a one-world government with no borders and no national sovereignty. Clinton-Blair-Schroder could not let THAT dog hunt. Therefore the plan had to be neutered -- quickly. With the growing tensions rising the United States and China, they found a ready-made target of opportunity.

Another reason for hitting the Chinese Embassy was to give them a little nudge; push China into attacking Taiwan and making it part of China once again.

The Kosovo autonomy plan being put forth by the Big Three does not sit well with either China or Russia. China still believes Taiwan belongs to them. Russia is still having problems with provinces like Chechnya that want to break away and become their own country. If NATO's Serbian Solution is successful, all groups of ethnic people, no matter where they are living, will be able to break away from their countries and form their own autonomous and independent nations. Yassar Arafat is drooling over the prospect of an autonomous Palestine in his lifetime.

When these new shake and bake nations evolve, "stuff" will happen. New nations will draw new borders. New borders will spark new disputes. War is always good for business, and for distracting folks.

What would be the purpose for such planned chaos? The operative word here is "planned." If the world can be destabilized and people scared by the orchestrated chaos, a stabilizing force could crush the fear. For a price. "Those who are willing to sacrifice a little freedom for a little security deserve neither," Ben Franklin said.

However, remember what Henry Kissinger said to the Bilderbergers in 1992 in Evian France:

Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order, tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.