Fox News is reporting: "Clinton will face dozens of perjury cases; evidence overwhelming." Trapped like a rat, Clintonistas are racking up mistakes both strategically and tactically. We are about to witness the endgame. For the umpteenth time, I will repeat that notwithstanding the lurid details of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, that issue has never really been about sex. Perjury, suborning perjury, obstruction of justice and abuse of power under the color of authority -- not to mention arrogant, myopic stupidity -- has been, is, and will be the essence of the Starr/Lewinsky matter. Thus far, Clinton has been able to lie routinely and consistently, and enlist the unbridled support of his legion of SOB's (Supporters of Bill). However, by his actions, and weak-mouthed admissions, he has significantly damaged the credibility of his previously successful spin doctors. Clinton is a festering wound which infects everything and everyone it touches. From the tragically flawed individual, to his family, his supporters, his administration, the country, and the Constitution to which he swore an oath ... all are tainted by the man. Unless or until he resigns or is removed from office, the infection will continue to eat away at all with which it comes in contact. It is no surprise that in wake of the recent attacks on terrorists the "Wag the Dog" scenario was recalled even before the President finished his announcement. Frankly, the President couldn't win no matter what he did or didn't do. The American people and the world, do not trust the words or motivation of an admitted liar. If it's too good to be true ... it isn't. Secretary of Defense Bill Cohen and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs' General Henry Shelton can brief ad nauseam rationalizations for the recent military action ... questions of timing, strategy and tactics will grow like bacteria. Here's a quick dozen:

First we heard intelligence was poor? ... then there was a remarkable "uncommon" convergence of good intelligence? We acted in a preemptive manner to prevent an imminent attack? If intelligence was so great, and we are so anxious to establish a new policy of preemptive raids, why didn't we act prior to the African atrocities? How many million dollar cruise missiles did we launch? 50? 75? 140? What is the damage assessment? What did we destroy? Who did we kill? What was accomplished strategically? What is the anticipated reaction to the U.S. action? Why was this a unilateral U.S. action without U.N. involvement? (Note: I like this newly demonstrated independence from the U.N. however, it is inconsistent with anything and everything this administration has done to date) Was the 50-140 million dollars of ordinance that was dropped cost effective? A cruise missile might be good for a hard target (factory), but for tents and troops in a desert? We have had various special operations groups in the area for some time. Those troops are smarter, more flexible, and cheaper than cruise missiles. However, they are more efficient and low profile than flocks of missiles.